|
河源翻译公司关键字：once again hit the pot. No co-operation, the total cost of single-stage kick. Cooperation after the cost of a single stage, obviously, the difference between the two is the amount of cost savings to increase the net benefits of the people. Participation and cooperation of the other participants will have the same welfare enhancing, even if the individual there is a difference between the cost function, but does not affect the basic conclusions. The above discussion assumes that marginal costs remain constant. Obviously, if reduced, benefits increase even more obvious; even increasing, in the case of small, is easy to guarantee. In fact, it will not take too large values, usually for boys and girls is appropriate.However, this program of cooperation in line with Pareto improvement for the water requirements (2) explicitly prohibited, it is indeed regrettable that the other person. Condition (2) of the proposed exaggerated a lot of water in the same day the possibility of excess water and the water supply side of the case, the pressure would, in fact, this situation will not arise. Even if the run does occur, people still have the right to non-acceptance of water supply (as described in section II), this fear is unnecessary. (1) and (2) essentially constitute a severe amount of control (7), the strict implementation of the transaction costs will cause a lot of money, so its effect can not long-term implementation.Now consider the condition (3). In the analysis of the attitudes of the water has been pointed out that the ticket collector who for various considerations, sometimes tolerated for the condition (3) violations, and thus condition (3) may not always be established, which fundamentally threaten the provision itself .Water collection is accompanied by elastic change vote. Although there is no express provision, but on weekends, in fact the prevalence of water free of charge; and ticket collectors usually only the peak of the kick, but earlier or later period of the booth is empty inside, then conditions (1), ( 2), (3) the destruction will be a matter of course at the same time. Naturally, the shorter the period the higher the concentration of water supply, regulations easier, whereas the more difficult. Although time is not sufficient water supply, water supply and collect tickets but people have been too long and laborious of his. Thus, the core of the system requirements that can not be successfully implemented, in the long run, this revision of that imperative.Four basic conclusions of the proposed changes andBased on the previous analysis, the existing water supply requirements for the necessary changes to make it consistent with the purpose and effect. The following brief analysis of the
|