|
亳州翻译公司关键字：Human life is subject to objective laws of economic constraints, a certain social system when it can accommodate the development of production, it will not withdraw from the stage of history. Economic and business owners are hiring a private business. Private economy to meet the diverse needs of people's lives; private economic property rights, economic incentives, self-restraint, since the risk and so have a comparative advantage; private equity diversified economy, capitalist society, can attract a large number of citizen participation, reflecting the equality of opportunity . Contemporary American and European countries, all policy, regulatory bodies set up to support the development of private small and medium enterprises. China is a developing country, is to promote industrialization, to prepare for the development of socialist productive forces. This ability to supply the private sector is necessary to take full advantage of.
Some income is too high for private business owners questioned. This is to make a concrete analysis, exploitation of workers in private business owners the residual value is an unquestionable fact. But it is to contribute to national economic prosperity. In addition, they are engaged in business management is a complicated labor, human capital should be paid, they put money capital and proprietary knowledge, market risks, to pay the opportunity cost, which should also return, so it included personal income, there its legitimacy.
Historical experience suggests that our primary stage of socialism suitable to implement a single public ownership, private ownership is not necessarily a single correct choice, the state economy or state regulation of national income which is not a lack of tools. Therefore, we must maintain the structure and function of coordination, there must be public private, the two co-exist, can not replace each other.
Countries need to organize a number of public utilities, public production of certain goods, otherwise it will weaken the regime's legitimacy. Citizens paid tax, just to pay for social welfare and public safety costs, including national defense, infrastructure construction, culture, education and other private contractors unable or unwilling to undertake the business. But the state's tax is limited, public utilities can not do without, nor excessive, its main function should be required to maintain a leading role in the national economy and influence. Some competitive industries, should be let out, to facilitate the concentration of capital to invest.
The main weakness of the state-owned owner of absence, due to managers not up to standard principal-agent relationship, information asymmetry, incentive incompatibility. Lack of binding due to budget, risk awareness is weak, difficult to treat the loss brought the phenomenon, but the transaction cost savings is more the advantages of command economy. Can be expected, the state economy through the reform, will become a profitable industry, must not be arbitrarily abolished. To avoid loss of state-owned enterprises and assets, and explore public ownership under the conditions of absence of the owner to resolve the problem, is pursuing a joint-stock company system, in which the rights and obligations to implement the specific natural and legal persons, established by the national holding company and asset management institutions for collecting capital to run messages, make suggestions disposal
|