|
龙岩翻译公司关键字：Oscar for the "latecomer disadvantage," said Yi Mufti a series of questions: first whether the system is a necessary condition for economic development? System first, is not necessarily to be a backward country, region into countries and regions? Is not without a system first, economic development, there must be very difficult, it will definitely lead to institutionalized state opportunism? Not only as the United Kingdom, the first reform of the constitutional system, in order to avoid later problems occur?
For these problems, Yi-fu that, in addition to the UK, we have not found a world where developing countries, the first for a constitutional reform, and have sustained and rapid economic development. On the contrary, in reality, people often only see the first constitutional reform aroused great example of social chaos. Indonesia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, the Philippines is the case. Yi-fu said, a country and region, if not the Oscar called radical constitutional reform, but also to catch up with developed countries. Of course, any country at any time there will be some economic problems in society, but can not put all blame China's problems are no constitutional reform. So, imagine a country, region, first with 50 to 100 years of constitutional reform, then to develop, in fact, this is not possible. This way of thinking itself is a problem.
Based on the above considerations, Yi Mufti a "system of health said." He believes that constitutional reform is not just constitutional issues. Constitutional reform, is bound to involve the executive, legislative and judicial powers between the checks and balances. The problem is, even if the constitution provides for such checks and balances, this is not so in reality there must be checks and balances. Yifu further pointed out that the system is important, but the system is in fact an optimal endogenous and endogenous system is in fact a relationship with the stage of development. Specific constitutional system is, Yi Fu pointed out that the formation of the constitutional system of checks and balances must be several political forces are about equal in the group. If no such group, even if the adoption of a constitution, it is only to have monopoly power in the political people to use the constitution curing their monopoly. Yifu example to Taiwan under Kuomintang rule, have so-called "Constitution." But the KMT as the ruling party on the one hand to the shelf, on the other hand the use of one of the provisions to defend its political monopoly. China's reform since 1978, largely related to the constitutional reform, but China's economic growth is a fact that has no home. This itself shows that technology can make to imitate fast economic development is not necessarily bound to institutionalize state opportunism. Yi husband insisted that, if not economic success was the development of political reform will be very difficult, because the system in the endogenous level of economic development.
Oscar, Yi-fu, a South (Australia), and the north (Beijing), each with two theoretical insight economist, two friends, swordfight Mountain. This naturally aroused China's strong academic and community concerns. Wrong? Who is right? Possible answer is: If you ask questions, itself may be wrong. Because economic phenomena and economic issues, not for the error-free. Economists look at the issue, would naturally have their own self-care. Oscar and Yi-fu and insights, each insightful, and in many ways to be consistent and complementary.
|