|
新乡翻译公司关键字：First, of the problemLately, Professor Lang has been criticized China's reform, it has evolved into a money embezzlement of state assets, the right to collude feast, and warned the central government should immediately stop is the crony capitalism into the abyss of Chinese enterprises reform of property rights. Lang The judge is correct, the central government has recognized from the action on this. Lang will also load thus the annals of China's reform, after which Lang has further pointed out that the key to China's current economic problems in China's lack of a "fiduciary duty" on, that is, the Chinese people of bad faith, then the credit should come from? Professor Lang said that from the strict discipline in the past, rather than from the laissez-faire market in the past, so he opened prescription, is that China should establish a strong government, strict laws, forcing people to establish a "fiduciary duty."
Second, Lang led the reflection of China's reform and confusionLang cry, led the reform of China since the reforms of the unprecedented large reflection and great debate. Practitioners and theorists are caught in the debate among the chaos in this confusion, the old order. " mainstream economists' theories and proposals for the reform of support order and pattern is broken, and the new theories and proposals have not yet had time to establish the pattern of support. "mainstream economists" in the current Chinese context seems to be a derogatory words, their theory, they suggested, or even their "conscience" is being questioned and condemned the general public, and the face of these questions and they could do nothing but condemn the inability to select the "conspiracy of silence." "Non-mainstream economists", it seems Lang cries to see into the "mainstream" of the dawn, and started back in Lang's under active, spare no effort to commence and the public a fierce criticism of the former mainstream. However, as the instigator of the incident Lang, because of its special identity and status, but detached on the mainland, this attempt to "mainstream" and "non-mainstream" argument above. His disdain on the mainland, "mainstream" economists, also disdain on the mainland, "non-mainstream economy" scientist.
Third, China is facing a large choiceChaos theorists will inevitably lead to practitioners of the confusion, the central government's decisions on the next step in the reform seems difficult. Yes, China's reform and the other person a frightened face, walking on thin ice pass a major decision. We are also standing on a high-level decision-makers or shining legacy, or the notoriety of the crossroads. At this point the decision you have to be extremely cautious, but thinking thinking. Because at this time of the decision-making, not only about the history of your personal reputation, but also about the more than a billion people in China for quite some time after the well-being!
Fourth, the failure of Continental economistsChina's "mainstream economists" to be oneself is a tool of Western mainstream economic theory, which in the past to guide the development of China's reform policy is the theoretical basis of the theory of neo-classical and the new system. These theories are in some basic assumptions above and proceed. We also know that the mainstream economists, but they overlooked is that these basic assumptions is the need to set up the appropriate social environment, that there are assumptions behind these assumptions. They understand the Western economic theory, but also to understand these theoretical assumptions, but they do not understand these assumptions, assumptions. For example, mainstream Western economic man is the most basic economic theory assumptions. However, this assumption requires the establishment of a certain social environment, that is required assumptions. This assumption is the assumption that recognition and protection of individuals' desires "and" property "of morality, values ??and legal system, and all this is not China. This assumption is the assumption that the cornerstone of modern society, is the cornerstone of a market economy. However, because the beginning of the birth of Western economic theory, this hypothesis assumes that after the Renaissance and Enlightenment England are already basically have, therefore, did not enter the study of Adam Smith's vision, but he did not realize to as hidden with the assumption. Even if, later Coase realized that the "property" of the important, but, in this hypothetical assumption under the cover of his description of the property rights of all meaning is only the tip of the iceberg on the water, the subject is hidden in this assumption The following assumptions. So, this led to the failure of mainstream economists in China.
|