|
宜春翻译公司关键字：In the incremental reform as the main feature of the system changes, social significantly increase overall revenue, the public income, quality of life improved significantly. The supply system of government which has acquired the necessary social legitimacy of support to the intrusion of the system is very small, mixed-mode access to the evolution of a balanced steady state. ESS is a Nash equilibrium of the refined, but its evolution can only be guaranteed once they reach steady state, the system can withstand mutations or intrusive, but can not guarantee that the dynamic evolution of the system to what state and final state is stable (Zhang Bridge, 2003). In other words, the system does not reach the next linear equilibrium.
We note that this hybrid model, social resources are operating under the two systems, two ways to obtain income. Those older people to get rid of the old institutional constraints as well as through market mechanisms under the two systems relative price changes than simply the accumulation of much wealth under the planning system [15], its wealth was significantly more than other social existence. This is to some extent the interests of the government hopes to induce the induced institutional change, thereby reducing the cost of the game later in the results. So, this is the academic theory known as the "vested interests" in the hybrid mode profit group created, we call the elite groups (Kang Xiaoguang, 2003, Xie Yue, 2004). This group represents the way the new system represents a new resource operational efficiency, and because the accumulation of wealth, so they tend to significantly high levels of consumption, and therefore the "elite" of the crown is appropriate. More importantly, after their financial ain, showing a strong political power impulse, this impulse stems from the protection of vested interests, requirements and cost more money to hope, they try to influence the bureaucracy through a variety of ways system operation, which is the history of China's gentry system has a similar logic. Thus, the elite group is getting into the game in the institutional change in the value of independent choice and strategy composition of a new class of participants. This third generation of participants in the game category, the evolution of the system after the material had a significant impact.
Fourth, the new game mode and the government led another dilemmaIt is precisely because the emergence of elite groups, the composition of the new game, new changes, which occur three types of participants - government, elite groups and the general public, the former two in the final strategy is the influence over the public of. Government-led institutional change in the Line, the end of the system has recognized the legitimacy of the right; elite groups are also easy with the bureaucracy of understanding or conspiracy to obtain control of some power; and the public in a decentralized decision-making status, its impact limited power to convey in the first set of channels, so the new game mode, still the performance of vulnerable groups.
We believe that there is no change in the basic constitutional framework of the case, even if the system changes into the structural adjustment phase, government-led game of logical and procedural arrangements will not change fundamentally. However, at this time of the institutional environment relative to the previous stage have been a very different, the most important point is that the system of government in order to supply mainly the same time, the system itself already has a certain amount of spontaneous evolution of requirements and capabilities. This is mainly due to infiltration of the elite group of political and social public interests of the relative dispersion trend. Therefore, the government-led model in the new game, not only the aforementioned dilemma has not been solved, and another facing a new dilemma.
First, the elite groups showed strong political infiltration. This is
|