新华翻译社总机:4008281111   客服部地址:南大街6号国务院机关第二招待宾馆(国二招)3号楼B5319室
 
机构概况
国家标准
翻译流程
翻译价格
人才信息
联系我们
 
翻译中心>>>新华翻译社>>>营口翻译公司

    翻译服务作为一个行业,在我国已经逐渐形成了规模,全国的翻译公司、翻译社、翻译中心和各类翻译服务机构已有上千家。翻译中心包括英文翻译中心、日文、韩文、德文、法文、西班牙文等翻译中心,作为一个新兴的行业,为改革开放、为国家经济工程建设和人们外事活动提供了各类卓有成效的翻译服务,受到了普遍的欢迎。对机械、化工、电子、仪表、医药、电力和石油等传统行业的更新换代,对新兴行业如:IT、计算机、金融、法律等领域的引进发展,翻译服务中心都起到了不可替代的作用。尤其在政府、企业、民间与国际交往的外事翻译中心和涉外经济合作中,翻译中心起到了传播最新知识、传递最新信息、宣传先进文化的桥梁作用。
    新华翻译中心已经形成了一套系统的管理模式,译校编制,装订成册,为用户提供一条龙服务。我们通常重视的三大核心问题,就是质量、周期和价格。如何处理好互相制约的这三大要素,就成了我们日常管理工作的重点。我们翻译中心在工作流程的管理方面,采取了制定作业规范的方式,而不是一般的规章制度,一直是各工序的作业指导书。从总的流程管理,到翻译校对、编排打字,都有各自的行之有效的作业规范。英语、日语、法语、韩语、西班牙语、意大利语翻译中心按国际质量体系保证模式的要求,建立完善的质量体系,就是要结合本单位的实际情况,确定自己的质量方针、质量目标、组织机构、以及所采用的质量体系要素,并规定详尽的实施程序。
营口翻译中心专业为高端客户提供英语、日语、德语、法语、韩语、俄语、西班牙语、意大利语、葡萄牙语、阿拉伯语等权威翻译服务。
 
 
 
营口翻译中心专业项目团队真诚服务营口市、站前区、西市区、鲅鱼圈区、老边区、盖州市、大石桥市
营口翻译公司关键字:Marx's theory of surplus value of his labor theory of value - that value creation and value of decision theory - the derivatives. Because of his labor theory of value is completely wrong, so the correctness of the theory of surplus value also goes without saying. Capitalist society (or under private ownership) of goods of economic activity, is indeed widespread labor exploitation, however, labor exploitation is not the only source of profit, or even may not be the main source. Because the above-mentioned "all productive factors, ie resources are wealth creators", and so-called profits, in fact, the capitalists in the business activities and the net wealth, that is, excluding the cost of a net increase of wealth of wealth. Therefore, the so-called "residual value" is not capitalist production (economic activity) for the sole purpose or fundamental purpose. At the same time, labor exploitation is not the only enemy of social and economic equity, but not the biggest enemy. The greatest enemy of social and economic equity is the main enemy of resources or the possession and consumption (use) is not fair. Of course, labor (labor) is also a resource. Furthermore, Marx's theory of basic economic law is wrong.My research found that about all the basic law of social and economic activities, namely, the basic economic laws, is "to minimize production cost utility maximization principle (principle)," rather than Marx's "equivalence principle." If you do not take into account Marx's "value creation, value of the decision" wrong theory itself, "equivalence principle" is at best, the most basic economic law that "utility maximization principle of minimum production cost", in which only a small minor. In fact, "equivalent" is just a "swap" tautology. Because "exchange" itself means "equal." Therefore, the so-called "equivalence principle" is almost not worth mentioning. ThreeThree theories mentioned above, namely, "value creation and value decisions (factors)" theory, theory of surplus value, the basic economic law theory is the foundation of Marx's labor theory of value and the trunk is the foundation of Marxist political economy. And these three theories are completely wrong, or almost completely wrong. Description of Marxist political economy is a theoretical system almost completely wrong. A theory in practice and are almost completely wrong theory (system), how to guide our practice and economic theory, and also as the (truth) standards? And even if the Marxist political economy (labor theory of value system) is completely correct, it can as we all actions (economic practice and theory) of the guidelines and standards? Not to say that only one standard of truth, that "practice" it? Marx was one hundred in one, and is "one" only, why Marxist theory to cover everything, why is the top one hundred to one? Why only use one and the rest of ninety-nine hard waste? This is not a serious anti-scientific approach? So, we said that China's economic problems, in essence, not the so-called 'Soviet paradigm', but rather "Kongsheng Fan" type of problem, is that "a Confucian Domination and 100 furniture waste," " cries and immobility alone a horse, "" thriving and flowers hold "superstition, myth, anti-science" feudal paradigm "issue. So, I want to ask out loud here: What should China Whither economics? Marx's theory should continue to "deification" or should be to "all" of? We have to superstition or to science?
营口翻译公司网站更新:
营口翻译中心版权所有