|
巴音郭楞翻译公司关键字：Looking back at history, we will find: Before 1988, the European Union to the former Soviet Union and other countries as non-market economy, but only to China as economies in transition. United States and the EU also adopted a similar approach. But in 1988 against Chinese companies with the anti-dumping case, China is also by the EU as a non-market economy country. From a legal point of view, because Europe is a case law, case law has the force of law, so, since after this first case from the European Union and the United States since then has been to China as a "non-market economy", and as a legal based on the wanton of the Chinese anti-dumping complaint.
Anti-dumping has become a "Made in China" to open up the main barriers to the international market, and "non-market economy status," often we lost the key.
Non-market economy status to China has brought a negative impact on three aspects: First, lead to "Made in China" in the anti-dumping in a very disadvantaged position as the main reason for Chinese enterprises losing; Second, Chinese enterprises difficult to win, stimulate further the objective of Chinese products in some countries to bring more anti-dumping complaints, creating a vicious cycle; third is a serious impact on China as a rising power's international image.
The end of 2001, China's accession to the WTO in the final stages of negotiations, the United States proposed a non-market economy status. At that time China agreed to other members in the 15 years after China's accession to WTO, China as a non-market economy. China's WTO Accession Protocol, Article 15 is "non-market economy status of China's terms," ??by this binding, China as a whole, may not be available in 15 years other members of China's "market economy status" of recognition. This is actually a discriminatory treatment. This makes it all the WTO members, China is the only application of the object of discriminatory treatment.
Why did China accept such a discriminatory terms? Three main reasons:The first reason is China's WTO accession, their market is not open to foreign package type, all of a sudden-like, but taking into account the situation in China in the automotive, finance, telecommunications and many other fields, have been related to retention. This essentially is the China-related industries of their own kind of "special protection" rights. So, other countries will certainly not let China only to enjoy the "privilege" and not pay for that, so, as the price of exchange, "non-market economy status" of the terms will appear. In other words, between the two is a "interest swap", China to accept the discriminatory provisions have also been other aspects of special rights.
The second reason is that China's WTO accession negotiations dragged on unresolved more than a decade, the United States has always insisted on the general safeguard clause, the special safeguards and anti-dumping provisions clamping three aspects of China's WTO accession, "throat", so, from the overall consideration , China's strategy is "paying the price point, more to gain time for development."
|